The Eighteenth
Sunday of the Year (B)
The desire for food and drink is perhaps the
greatest desire about which we think most.
It is certainly the one felt most physically and the one toward which we
often put the greatest amount of effort toward satisfying.
It is this desire for food and drink that led
the Israelites to grumble against Moses and Aaron (cf. Exodus 16:2). It is this same hunger and thirst that led
the crowds to follow Jesus (cf. John 6:24).
Even so, there is something more happening in
these passages than a simple physical hunger and thirst, for we use this desire
for food and drink as a metaphor for other desires. We speak of a person’s thirst for power or of
a hunger for wealth. Jesus, too, spoke
in this way about “those who hunger and thirst for righteousness” (Matthew
5:6).
Hunger and thirst, then, can be said to
encompass all of our desires, all of our passions. When the Israelites grumbled against Moses,
when the crowds followed Jesus, they were not simply looking for earthly food;
they sought, rather, the satisfaction of their deepest yearnings and longings,
even if they did not quite recognize it.
They sought that which truly satisfies (and it was not a Snickers bar).
We heard last week that with the
multiplication of the loaves and fish, everyone in the crowd “had eaten their
fill” before the fragments leftover were collected (John 6:12). But this was not the purpose of this miracle;
rather, Jesus intended to teach them something far more profound and
important. If Jesus can satisfy their
physical hunger so completely, how much more can he satisfy their spiritual
hunger! It is of him that the Psalmist
sings: “As the deer longs for flowing streams, so longs my soul for you, O
God. My soul thirsts for God, for the
living God” (Psalm 42:1-2).
Toward the end of his life, Saint Thomas
Aquinas, one of the greatest minds the Church has ever known, was writing a
treatise on the Eucharist, struggling to complete it. In great frustration, the quiet man of God
threw his text at the foot of a crucifix, asking the Lord what he thought of
what he had written.
The voice of God came through the figure of
the Crucified Christ, saying to him: “You have written well of me, Thomas. What would you have?”
Saint Thomas could choose whatever he wanted,
whatever he desired. Would he ask for
wealth or fame or power? Would he ask
for love or athletic skill or simple pleasures?
He could ask for anything; what would he ask of the Lord?
He answered the Savior with these words: “Nil nisi te, Domine, nil nisi te. Only you, Lord, only you.”
The Angelic Doctor answered wisely and
honestly. Saint Thomas “wanted nothing
more than Christ, nothing other than Christ, nothing less than Christ.” He knew that, as he had written earlier in
his life, “God alone satisfies.” I wonder, what would you or I ask of the
Lord?
Here at this altar he gives himself to us, the
bread “which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world” and those who
eat his Body “will never hunger” (cf. John 6:33; John 6:35). How is it, then, that so many come here week
after week and leave hungry each time?
How is it possible to leave here with a heavy and empty heart?
The answer is simple: they do not recognize
him; they do not adequately prepare themselves to receive him; and they do not
believe that he wants to satisfy their every desire. What is more, they do not recognize in the
Eucharist the very Body and Blood of our Lord.
For if we recognized his Real Presence among
us in the Eucharist, who would arrive late to Mass or leave before the
dismissal; who would not come to the Mass dressed appropriately and modestly;
who would receive Holy Communion in a sloppy or hurried manner; who would
hesitate to show their devotion and love and spend time in prayer to prepare
themselves; who would fail to confess their sins and receive absolution?
Too many come here day after day never
recognizing – or at least never admitting – their deep hunger and thirst for
Christ! Because they do not know for
what they long their hunger is not satisfied and their thirst is not
quenched. Still hungering and thirsting
they seek to satisfy their desires in the things of this world, and yet never
do they find lasting satisfaction.
But to those who receive the Body and Blood of
the Lord Jesus Christ in faith, who have prepared themselves well to receive
him, he addresses his promise: “I am the bread of life: whoever comes to me
will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst” (John
6:35). In receiving him, they receive
all they seek; they find in him lasting happiness, joy and peace. This Saint Thomas knew well and so he said,
“God alone satisfies.”
My dear brothers and sisters, the Lord wishes
to satisfy the true desire of our heart, if we but come to him in faith. If the Lord asked us, as he asked Saint
Thomas, “What would you have,” what would we ask of him? Would we ask for the things of this world –
those things that promise to satisfy us but never do - or would we say with
Saint Thomas, “Nil nisi te, Domine;
only you, Lord”?
Toward the end of his life, Saint Thomas
Aquinas, one of the greatest minds the Church has ever known, was writing a
treatise on the Eucharist, struggling to complete it. In great frustration, the quiet man of God
threw his text at the foot of a crucifix, asking the Lord what he thought of
what he had written.
Father, this seems to be a homily that indicts the laity and the laity alone. Does this Sunday's Gospel have any relevance for our fellow Christians who are priests and bishops? Or are we to assume simply that many among the laity are slouches--the laity needs to improve--and that's the only take-away?
ReplyDeleteI'm not trying to be flippant here. Truthfully, though, I get a lot more out of a homily in which I understand the homilist to be a fellow pilgrim on the faith journey toward Christ, rather than someone who can simply name the most common sins/shortcomings of all the people in the pews.
You're reading far too much into this, Steve. I made no distinction in the homily between clergy and laity; that distinction is yours, not mine.
DeleteI would suggest that you stop reading into things what is not there; it's time for more exegesis and less eisegesis.