War broke out in heaven; Michael and his angels battled against the dragon. The dragon and its angels fought back, but they did not prevail and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. The huge dragon, the ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, who deceived the whole world, was thrown down to earth, and its angels were thrown down with it (Revelation 12:7-9).The name of this dragon, of the Devil, of Satan, is Lucifer, a name meaning "Light-Bearer." The Archangel Michael - who's name means "Who is like God?" - led the host of heaven in battle against Lucifer.
30 September 2008
29 September 2008
Today we pray with the Psalmist, “Remember your mercies, O Lord” (Psalm 25:6).
We beg the Lord to remember his mercy toward us because we are all too often like that second son of whom Jesus speaks (cf. Matthew 21:30). He said that he would carry out the wishes of his father, but he did not.
We hear the voice of Jesus every day, urging us and telling us how to be faithful to him. Each day of our lives he says to us, “go out and work in the vineyard today” (Matthew 21:29). Sometimes we do the work of the Lord, and other times we do not.
What is this work that the Lord asks us to perform? What does it mean to labor in his vineyard? It means, first of all, that we must turn from our wickedness and do what is just and right (cf. Ezekiel 18:27). Having done so, we will have in us “the same attitude that is also in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 2:6).
But some will surely say, “I have not done anything wicked; I am basically a good person.” The second part may well be true, but not the first. Each of us has committed – and even still commits – wicked deeds, for whenever we fail to carry out the Lord’s work in his vineyard that he has given us to do we turn to wicked deeds. Whenever we fail to love we surely do not do good deeds, but wicked.
The Apostle Paul says to us today, “complete my joy by being of the same mind, with the same love, united in heart, thinking one thing” (Philippians 2:2). The one thing of which Saint Paul begs us to think is Jesus Christ.
It is Christ himself that we are to imitate and follow, for “he shows sinners the way” (Psalm 25:8); it is he who shows us what is just and right.
We know that by virtue of our Baptism we have become one with Christ, members of his Body, the Church, and we are therefore united with each other and with every member of the baptized. This is why the Apostle says to us, “Do nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory; rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves; each looking out not for his own interests, but also for those of others” (Philippians 2:3-4).
But how are we to do this? How are we to have in us that same attitude that is in Christ? It is only by listening to him and by being obedient to Christ Jesus – as he was obedient to the Father – that our work in the vineyard will bear fruit.
It comes down to a question of obedience. Will we listen to the voice of Christ, the Good Shepherd (cf. John 10:27), who “guides the humble to justice and teaches the humble his way” (Psalm 25:9)? Or will we be like that second son, who “turns away from virtue to commit iniquity, and dies” (Ezekiel 18:26)? Will we be a faithful son or no? The choice is ours; we need only “listen to him” (Matthew 17:5).
How then are we to grow in virtue and grow ever more obedient to Christ so that we will live and not die? We need look no further than where we are, here, at the altar of the Lord, gathered as we are for the celebration of the Holy Mass.
When he was in France last week commemorating the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Marian apparitions at Lourdes, Pope Benedict XVI reminded us:
The Mass invites us to discern what, in ourselves, is obedient to the Spirit of God and what, in ourselves, is obedient to the spirit of evil. In the Mass, we want to belong to Christ and we take up with gratitude – with thanksgiving – the cry of the psalmist: “How shall I repay the Lord for his goodness to me? (Psalm 116:12).”
Yes, how indeed shall we repay the Lord? We must first consider again how it is that the Lord has shown his goodness to us.
Here, at the altar of the Lord, in every celebration of the Eucharist, we know that these words of Saint Paul are true, that Christ Jesus
emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; and found human in appearance, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to the point of death, death on a cross (Philippians 2:7-8).
Here at this altar the Lord Jesus continually empties himself for us as he gives himself to us in the Eucharist. He humbles himself for us and makes himself present under the appearance of bread and wine. His goodness toward us is shown in his giving of himself for us.
Here at this altar the death of Jesus Christ is re-presented to the Father and we who have been baptized into his death and resurrection are invited to partake of his Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity, all because Christ Jesus continually humbles himself and comes to us.
It is here that we learn the attitude that is in Christ, the attitude of humble and faithful love that gives itself completely and entirely for the other. It is this same attitude that you and I must have in us.
In the presence of such great love, how can we not listen to Christ Jesus? How can refuse to carry out his will for us? Looking upon the Crucified Lord do we not know that we must give ourselves to him as he has given himself to us? Yes, let us love the Lord Jesus by taking upon ourselves the same attitude that is his so that we might love our neighbor as well.
To do so we must humble ourselves and listen to the Lord, trusting that he knows what is best for us. It may at first seem to us that the work he asks us to do in his vineyard is toilsome, but if we place our hand to the plow he sets before us we will find his work brings great delight and satisfaction. Indeed, he knows well what will satisfy the deepest aspirations of our hearts and it is this that he sets before us. To carry out the work of the Lord is to find our peace and to belong to Christ.
Let each of us then be like that son who carried out his father’s will. It is true that at first he said, “No,” to his father, but it is also true that the Lord shows we sinners the way.
The son’s love for his father kept tugging at his heart and he humbled himself, he set aside his own desires and set to work, in the end obeying his father. We, too, must let our love for the Lord direct every aspect of our lives that we might work well in his vineyard and, with his grace, bring about a rich harvest and live. Amen.
28 September 2008
For two months, June and July, we have the sun directly over our heads; still the heat is not so great as I thought. The climate is delightful, so that strangers easily become accustomed to it, and generally enjoy better health here than in their own country.
27 September 2008
I cannot thank Fr. Carl enough for his great generosity. Whenever I call asking for assistance he never hesitates to agree, and then he checks his calendar. I don't know what I would do without him! If I ever get to retire I only hope to be half as generous as him!
Tomorrow's homily is nearly finished, but needs just a bit of tidying up before posting; look for it later tonight.
To obtain this happiness ... let us begin from this very day to prepare for a happy death. Let us not lose a moment of the little time we have still to live; let us walk on in th way of holiness and justice, persuaded that at that moment we too shall have the happiness of hearing those consoling words: "Come, ye good and faithful servants, who have been faithful in small things, to take possession of the kingdom I have prepared for you.Please keep the boys in your prayers today; it's going to be a long day.
26 September 2008
After receiving our “coupon” I couldn’t help but laugh, albeit a bit nervously. This lure gesture of good will is exactly what made me feel uneasy while passing the church. It reflects a consumer model of religion — a true relationship with Christ reduced down to a marketing ploy for the trendiest group or club in town. “He who has the most toys at the end wins,” only in this case it’s the “church” who has the largest crowd wins.
This model lacks a sense of sacredness, history, truth, Tradition. An authentic Christian community should come together in communion to acknowledge and rejoice in their beliefs as truth, i.e. their faith. They gain strength in their faith from knowing that those around them hold those same beliefs true.
Instead of strengthening the faith of its community of believers, the consumer model mocks faith, commercializing beliefs to be sold for whatever the spectators will pay for it.
These two brothers lived in Syria in the second half of the third century and were both physicians. In Cyrrhus, Syria, the brothers received the grace of martyrdom around the year 300.
With three other brothers – Antimas, Leontius and Euprepius – Cosmas and Damian were born to their pious mother, Theodoche in Egea, a city in Arabia.
They devoted themselves especially to the care of the sickly poor and refused to accept money for their services because, as the Golden Legend relates they answered the Proconsul Lisias, “as for earthly fortunes, Christians do not acquire them.” Because of their refusal to accept money Cosmas and Damian were called the anargupoi, “the moneyless ones.”
We are told that the brothers promised each other never to accept money in exchange for their medical care. One day Saint Damian healed a woman by the name of Palladia, who begged the holy doctor to accept her gift in the name of the Lord. Desiring to honor her request and the name of the Lord, Damian accepted her gift.
When Cosmas learned of this he was furious and instructed that, upon his death, he was not to be buried with Damian. Later that night the Lord appeared to Cosmas in a dream and explained the situation, thereby satisfying him, but not soon enough, for word of the brothers reached the ears of above-mentioned Lisias.
The proconsul ordered the brothers – together with the other three - to be brought before him and ordered that they burn incense to the gods of Rome. The Golden Legend continues:
When the five brothers unanimously refused to sacrifice, Lisias commanded that they be tortured in their hands and feet. They made light of these torments, and he ordered them to be bound with chains and thrown into the sea, but at once they were drawn out by an angel and set before the judge. This official gave thought to the matter and said: “By the great gods, it is by sorcery that you conquer, because you mock at torments and calm the sea! Therefore teach me your magic arts, and in the name of the god Adrian I will follow you.” No sooner had he said this than two demons appeared and struck him in the face with great force, and he cried out, “I beg you, good men, to pray for me to your God!” They prayed, and the demons disappeared.
The judge said: “You see how angry the gods are with me because I thought of leaving them. Now therefore I will not suffer you to blaspheme my gods!” He ordered them to be thrown into a huge fire, but the flame not only left the martyrs unharmed, but leapt out and slew many bystanders. The brothers were then stretched on the rack, but their guardian angel kept them uninjured, and the torturers, tired of beating them, returned to the judge. He in turn had three of the brothers put back in prison, but ordered Cosmas and Damian to be crucified and stoned by a crowd. The stones were turned back upon the throwers and wounded a great number. The judge, now beside himself with rage, had the three brothers brought out and ranged around the cross, while four soldiers shot arrows at Cosmas and Damian, still crucified; but the arrows turned and struck many, while the holy martyrs remained untouched. The judge, defeated at every turn, was at death’s door from frustration and had the five brothers beheaded in the morning. The Christians, remembering what Saint Cosmas had said about not burying him with Damian, wondered how the martyrs wanted to be buried, when suddenly a camel appeared on the scene, spoke in a human voice, and ordered the saints to be entombed in one place. They suffered under Diocletian, who began to reign about a.d. 287.
Together Cosmas and Damian are the patrons of physicians, surgeons, druggists, barbers, the blind and, curiously, confectioners.
O sacred Heart of Jesus,
remembering the undaunted hope
which sustained Father Damien during all his life
and confident in Your Paternal Providence,
through the Immaculate Heart of Mary
I humbly beg You to grant the favor
of never becoming discouraged
in the adversities of this life
and furthermore of being so strongly encouraged by heavenly hope
to always live confidently in Your Merciful Love.
Thank you, Sacred Heart of Jesus, Immaculate Heart of Mary, and Blessed Damien, for favors received.
It was drawn this year by Matt Willenborg, one of our former soccer team members. I rather like it.
25 September 2008
24 September 2008
What is this word? Saint John the Evangelist tells us that Jesus is the word of the Lord: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1).
Not only is Jesus the Word, he is also the lamp, the light itself. He says, “I am the light of the world” (John 9:5).
Moreover, Jesus is also the path upon which our feet walk, for he says, “I am the way and the truth and the life” (John 14:6).
The words of the Psalmist are a great foreshadowing of Christ Jesus.
Is this not a great marvel? This morning at Mass with the first, second and third graders I connected this refrain to the life of Saint Anthony of Padua.
Perhaps the most common portrayal of the Evangelic Doctor depicts him holding the Christ-child in his arms. Our heavenly patron is portrayed twice in this way in our church.
The story goes that he was staying in the home of a man named Tiso, who gave Anthony a room away from other people so that he might pray in solitude and quiet.
Tiso, being a good host, frequently walked by the Saints room to make sure he was comfortable and all was well.
One time he saw a light shining out from under the door and, on coming closer to investigate, he heard voices.
Peering into the room, Tiso saw the man of God kneeling before his desk, with a book lying open upon it and upon the book was a luminous child, more beautiful than any he had ever seen, whispering into the ear of Anthony.
May each of us, too, listen to and meditate upon the Divine Word. Let us bask in the beauty of his light and walk on his path.
Truly the thought of the uncertainty of the morrow should produce in a soul most hearty contrition; but for us, Christians or religious, who look upon ourselves as exiles here below, and who long only for the dissolution of our body that we may enter our true country, there is, it appears to me, only joy and blessedness in the thought each moment we get nearer to th last hour of our life.
It is a short little book (only 30 pages), but it includes several of Father Damien's letters, which are a great pleasure to read.
On Christmas Day 1858, then Joseph De Vuester wrote to his parents, asking their permission and blessing for him to pursue his vocation. His words may seem harsh:
My dear parents: I cannot hesitate to write to you on this grand Christmas Day, for the great feast has brought me to the certainty that God has called me to quit the world and embrace the religious state. Therefore, my dear parents, I ask you again for your consent; for without it I cannot venture to enter on this career. God's command to obey our parents does not apply only to childhood.
Do not think that in choosing the religious state I am guided by own will; I assure you that I do but follow the will of Divine Providence. I am not afraid that you will refuse me, since it is God who calls, and I am obliged to obey his call. For you to hinder your child from following God's will, would expose yourselves to terrible consequences from His anger, and would expose me to the irreparable misfortune of losing the vocation for which God has destined me from infancy, and would put in jeopardy your eternal salvation.
You know, my dear parents, that each individual is bound to conform himself to the designs of God in choosing a state of life, if he wishes to make his future happiness secure; do not, therefore, distress yourselves at God's designs for me. Augustus [his older brother] writes me that I should certainly be admitted in his Congregation as "Frere de Choeur," that I should not fail to speak to the Superior at the New Year, and should begin my novitiate a little later.
Hoping for this great happiness, I sign myself, your obedient son.
What she wants to say is straight to the point. I wonder, if we spoke like this, would it be helpful? Would it help people understand the great importance of the faith? Would it help jar them out of their stuppor?
I don't know. What do you think?
Fr. Joel at Holy Priesthood has a clever commentary on society today.
The American Papist gives us an awesome picture of the Pontifex Maximus.
A Catholic Mom in Hawaii directs our attention to a PBS poll concerning Governor Sarah Palin.
The Crescat provides us with photos of Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, a.k.a., Padre Pio.
Over at Unam Sanctam, Andrew skillfully answers a “non-denominational” Protestant.
What Daren Means
You are balanced, orderly, and organized. You like your ducks in a row.
You are powerful and competent, especially in the workplace.
People can see you as stubborn and headstrong. You definitely have a dominant personality.
You are usually the best at everything ... you strive for perfection.
You are confident, authoritative, and aggressive.
You have the classic "Type A" personality.
You are wild, crazy, and a huge rebel. You're always up to something.
You have a ton of energy, and most people can't handle you. You're very intense.
You definitely are a handful, and you're likely to get in trouble. But your kind of trouble is a lot of fun.
You are friendly, charming, and warm. You get along with almost everyone.
You work hard not to rock the boat. Your easy going attitude brings people together.
At times, you can be a little flaky and irresponsible. But for the important things, you pull it together.
You are very intuitive and wise. You understand the world better than most people.
You also have a very active imagination. You often get carried away with your thoughts.
You are prone to a little paranoia and jealousy. You sometimes go overboard in interpreting signals.
Capello tip to A Catholic Mom in Hawaii.
23 September 2008
After a quick perusal of the book I decided it would be perfect to help prepare six Bible studies going through Saint Paul's teaching on the Sacraments. This would serve the double purpuse of focusing on the Apostle during his year and of reflecting more on the Sacraments. I think it went well this first night.
Those who came kindly gave pemission to record my presentation on my new digital voice recorder. The quality is good, but now I have to find a way to get it from the recorder onto my computer. I apparently don't yet have all of the necessary cables. I'll try to remedy that in the morning.If I can figure out how to do it, I will post this evening's Bible study as a podcast.
22 September 2008
The crowd grows silent. Hooves thunder. And you, brave knight that you are, knock your opponent to the ground. Huzzah! Revisit the days of yore and get all medieval with this fun action toy. Each knight-on-horse is 7" long, 6" high. Comes with two jousting staves and two remote controls. Set requires 8 AA batteries (not included). Ages 8 and up.
I'm certainly old enough.
The remote control jousting knights would certainly be magnificant entertainment on those days when I'm feeling particularly goofy - which might increase if I had a pair - but what of those days I'm in the mood for something a bit more...intellectual?For these days, this looks appealing: Solitaire with Semiprecious Marbles.
It's description reads:
Legend says that th game of solitaire was created by a nobleman confined to the Bastille prison during the French Revolution. The goal is to eliminate all but one marble. This beautifully crafted game features a hardwood gameboard and hand-cut, hand-polished semiprecious stone marbles - agate, columbite, green jasper, rhodonite, and a variety of other stones. Set of 38 includes two spares. Marbles will vary from set to set; board is 9 1/2" diameter.
I've stayed at a friary in a northern state a few times that has this very game. I've been known to sit there for more than an hour at a time playing the game. I love it!
Do you have a favorite catalogue like this one?
On their way back to their pew, he told Mom they had to make a batch for me Sunday night to give to me Monday morning. I'm happy to say they did just that.
The other boy apparently asked Mom if she thought I knew how to dip the cookies in milk, because they are really good that way. She told him that I was a boy once, too, and she was sure I knew about dipping cookies in milk. She's right, of course.
Friday and Saturday the junior varsity soccer team played in a tournament in a Highland, a little more than an hour away. They lost their game Friday night 5-0, won their game Saturday morning 2-1, and lost their game Saturday afternoon 2-0.
We drove to Highland and back on Friday and again on Saturday, which provided two very entertaining car trips with the players. Lots of laughter was had, and even a bit of serious conversation.
After the second game on Saturday I hopped back in my and returned to Effingham with a little time to spare before the evening Mass.
When we returned from the game on Friday I popped out to the high school to show up - just briefly - for the "neon dance." I hated dances in high school, and my dislike of them hasn't changed. I've never been one for crowds, dark rooms and loud music. That, and I'm not one to dance anyway.
I've spent a good part of this afternoon learning more about podcasting. If all goes well, I'll be ready to begin by the end of the month. I'd like to start podcasting on the Feast of St. Francis, but I'll be in Quincy on a Great River Teens Encounter Christ retreat. Still, I suppose I could publish the podcast before the weekend starts... We'll see what happens.
In the morning I'll be interviewed again on WCRA radio, AM 1090 and FM 104.7. I believe the topic will be Pope Benedict XVI's address to the representatives of the French world of culture.
At 7:00 p.m., I'll be resuming my Bible studies at our mission parish discussing Saint Paul and Baptism.
It's looking as though it will be a busy week, but's alright.
21 September 2008
Today our common perception of the world is challenged. The prophet Isaiah tells us that God does not think as we do (Isaiah 55:8); Saint Paul tells us that death is life (Philippians 1:21); and Jesus tells us not to look at what others have (cf. Matthew 20:15). Taking these three together it is clear that we must change the way we see the world.
Looking out onto the world, what do you see? Where is your focus? To what is your gaze and attention drawn?
There are many today who live each day thinking only of this life and of what they can get out of it. Life is for the taking, they say, yet the more they grab the more they want and the unhappier they become.
Do we not all do this, at least from time to time? Do we not keep our eye fixed on the things of this world, forgetful that this life prepares us for the next? It is this view of the world – our constant focus on this life – that we must change.
To our thinking the parable of the workers in the vineyard is unjust. It is not fair to pay people equal wages for unequal work, we say. And yet this is precisely what Jesus says happens. What is he trying to tell us here?
If the purpose of this parable is to show us that the Lord gives equally to all, if it is one meant for encouragement, why do we find it so disconcerting?
If the Lord were simply handing out money in the parable what he does may well be unjust, even though all of the workers did agree to the same wage. But the One who tells this parable is the same One who tells his disciples to “carry no money bag,” so we know that he cannot here be referring to money (Luke 10:4).
What, then, is this “usual daily wage,” this denarius, that the Lord gives us? It is “neither silver nor gold,” (Acts 3:6) but the gift of the Spirit that perfects us and leads us to eternal life. The Lord calls all people to receive this grace of the Spirit at the same time, but we answer at different times because of the choices we make and the way in which we see the world.
In Greek, Jesus asks,”h o ojqalmoV sou ponhroV oti egw agaqoV eimi” (Matthew 20:15)? “Is your eye wicked because I am good?” What does he mean?
Why did those laborers in the vineyard grow envious of those hired after them? It was because of their wicked eyes. They were not content with what the Lord gave them and thought themselves better and more deserving than those hired after them. Their jealousy turned their eye to wicked glances. My brothers and sisters, is any of us more deserving of the Lord’s grace than another? Of course not! “Indeed, we must all rejoice exceedingly to be even the last in the kingdom of God,” because none of us deserves Paradise!
The fact that we often grow upset when we consider that those who convert on their deathbed receive the same grace as us is a sign that our love is not yet sincere, that we do not yet appreciate the Lord’s mercy toward us. If we did, we would desire that mercy to be shared with every person.
The challenge before us today, the question the Gospel poses to us, is this: “whether the first ones, who were righteous and pleased God and who shone brightly from their labors through the whole day, at the end are possessed by the lowest vice, envy and jealousy.” Notice that envy and jealousy can bring our good works to nothing.
Our eye grows wicked through envy and jealousy as we look to what others have been given and when we consider ourselves more deserving than they. This is what Jesus means when he asks, “Is your eye wicked because I am good?” Are we jealous because “the Lord is gracious and merciful, slow to anger and of great kindness” (Psalm 145:8)? Are we envious because “the Lord is good to all and compassionate toward all his works” (Psalm 145:9)? Do we look around, envious of his generosity? If we do, it is because we see the world improperly.
Writing to the Church at Philippi, Paul tells us that he is torn between two great desires, that of dying and that of living. He says,
And I do not know which I shall choose. I am caught between the two. I long to depart this life and be with Christ, for that is far better. Yet that I remain in the flesh is more necessary for your benefit (Philippians 1:22-24).
Paul goes on to say, “Convinced of this, I know that I shall remain and continue with you all, for your progress and joy in the faith” (Philippians 1:25).
The Apostle knows the Lord has given him a work to do and because he does this work he says, “Christ will be magnified in body, whether by life or by death” (Philippians 1:20). Would that each of us could say these words! Paul knows his task and he sets to it as the “good and faithful servant” (Matthew 25:23).
The Lord Jesus has indeed given each of us a task to do, a work to undertake, whether it be as a husband or wife, a mother or father, a child, a student or priest or professed religious. We are all workers in the Lord’s vineyard, though some of us perform our work better than others.
Pope Saint Gregory the Great reminds us, “All voices shout, ‘Christ,’ but not everyone’s life shouts it. Many follow God with their voices but flee from him with their conduct.” More than our voices, our very lives must shout Christ so that he will be magnified in us.
Christ has called each of us “to do not merely what pertains to our own benefit but to do what pertains to the glory of God.”
Do you want to be happy? Then follow the example of Saint Paul and live not for your own sake but for the sake of Christ.
Do you want to be free? Then follow the example of Saint Paul who lived not as his own master but as a servant of the Lord.
If we look at life with a wicked and jealous eye, the example of Paul seems ridiculous. But if we stop, even for a moment, and look at Paul with a good eye we know that he lived rightly.
If we seek happiness in this life and in the next, we must work as laborers in the Lord’s vineyard because “from him we come, by his own power we are created, and to him we return.”
At the end of each day, let each of us echo the words of that servant in another parable: “We are unprofitable servants; we have done what we were obliged to do” (Luke 17:10). Amen.
 Saint Gregory the Great, Forty Gospel Homilies, 19.4. In ibid., 111.
 Saint John Chrysostom, The Gospel of Matthew, Homily 64.3. In ibid., 111.
 Saint Gregory the Great, Forty Gospel Homilies 19.5. In ibid., 112.
 Incomplete Work on Matthew, Homily 34. In ibid., 108.
 Saint Ambrose, On Abraham 2.5.22. In ibid., 218.
18 September 2008
Capello tip to Joey at Catholic Homeschooled Teens.
It apparently doesn't matter that I said I am a male...
Your result for The Who Would You Be in 1400 AD Test...
You scored 13% Cardinal, 72% Monk, 53% Lady, and 43% Knight!
You are a moral person and are also highly intellectual. You like your solitude but are also kind and helpful to those around you. Guided by a belief in the goodness of mankind you will likely be christened a saint after your life is over.
You scored high as both the Lady and the Monk. You can try again to get a more precise description of either the Monk or the lady, or you can be happy that you're an individual.
Capello tip to A Catholic Mom in Hawaii.
Items can be dropped off at Catholic Charities between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday or brought to the parish and we will see them delivered. Also, don't forget our monthly food pantry collection the last weekend of each month at the church.
Those of you outside the Effingham area might also consider making a donation to your local food pantry.
Tuesday afternoon the priests of the Diocese gathered with Bishop Lucas for the annual Clergy Convocation. I had hoped to post from the Convocation but Internet access was very limited. It was the first convocation of my priesthood that I have enjoyed fully.
The only enjoyable part of the past three convocations was being with my brother priests; this year I had that joy and the joy of being spiritually and intellectually stimulated. It was so nice to hear, "Do you know this book? You should read..." I love academia.
Fr. Robert Barron, a priest of the Archdiocese of Chicago and of Word on Fire fame (and a professor of mine in the seminary) spoke to us of the three-fold ministry of the priest as one who sanctifies, teachers and governs. To do so he focused on the images of Christ as priest, prophet and king.
As Fr. Barron always does, he combined his vast learning and his easy humor to teach us and inspire us; I am very glad he came.
I was only able to be present for his reflections on the images of prophet and priest because I had to return to the parish a day early for a funeral celebrated this morning.
Until I'm able to resume regular blogging, you might be interested in a new project, "The Catholicism Project," Fr. Barron is working on; I'm rather excited to see the finished results. Here's the video:
I'll post more once I've caught up on a few things.
15 September 2008
Following the Mass, Bishop Lucas will lead a prayerful rosary walk to the abortion clinic.
A light luncheon and presentation by a speaker from Gospel of Life Ministries will follow the walk.
If you are able, please plan to attend.
Over at Adam’s Ale, Fr. V. offers a suggestion on what to do when the homily is dreadfully boring.
The American Papist answers Time magazine’s question, “Does Biden have a Catholic Problem?” in the affirmative.
Fr. Selvester has a post showing the arms of priests, including my own:
The word does not lead to a purely individual path of mystical immersion, but to the pilgrim fellowship of faith. And so this word must not only be pondered, but also correctly read.
The God who speaks in the Bible teaches us how to speak with him ourselves. Particularly in the book of Psalms, he gives us the words with which we can address him, with which we can bring our life, with all its highpoints and lowpoints, into conversation with him, so that life itself thereby becomes a movement towards him.
For prayer that issues from the word of God, speech is not enough: music is required.
Christian worship is therefore an invitation to sing with the angels, and thus to lead the word to its highest destination.
[I]n communal prayer one is singing in the presence of the entire heavenly court, and is thereby measured according to the very highest standards: that one is praying and singing in such a way as to harmonize with the music of the noble spirits who were considered the originators of the harmony of the cosmos, the music of the spheres.
[T]he word of God only comes to us through the human word and through human words, that God only speaks to us through the humanity of human agents, through their words and their history. This means again that the divine element in the word and in the words is not self-evident. To say this in a modern way: the unity of the biblical books and the divine character of their words cannot be grasped by purely historical methods.
It really is a magnificent address.It would be a disaster if today’s European culture could only conceive freedom as absence of obligation, which would inevitably play into the hands of fanaticism and arbitrariness. Absence of obligation and arbitrariness do not signify freedom, but its destruction.
14 September 2008
While he was in prayer he received a divine vision. His biographer, Brother Tomaso of Celano describes the event:
…he saw a man above him with six wings like a seraph whose hands were outstretched and whose feet were joined together, and who was nailed to the cross… When he saw this, the blessed servant of the Most High was filled with admiration, but he was unable to understand the meaning of the vision. He was inflamed with joy by the loving sweetness of the Seraph’s glance, which was immeasurably beautiful, yet he was terrified by the consideration of that cross to which he was nailed and the bitterness of his passion. He got up feeling sad yet happy at the same time, if this is what we call it, and joy and sorrow were intermingled in him…What perhaps strikes me most about Francis’ vision is that it left him “feeling sad yet happy” and that “joy and sorrow were intermingled in him.”
His [Francis’] hands and feet were pierced right through the middle by nails and the heads of these nails could be seen in the palms of his hands and on the upper part of his feet, whereas the ends came out on the opposite side. The seals were round on his palms and long on the backs of his hands, and a bit of flesh, like a twisted and riveted end of a nail, stuck out from the rest of his skin… Moreover his right side looked as if it had been pierced by a lance and had a long scar that bled frequently so that his robe and his underpants would often get wet…
Although this servant and friend of the Most High found himself adorned with these pearls, like most precious gems, and was more wonderfully rich in honor and glory than any other man, he nevertheless did not become haughty about it deep within himself and never attempted to boast about it with anyone out of the desire for vainglory. Instead, in order to prevent the favor of men from stealing heavenly grace from him, he tried to hide it in every way possible (First Life, 94-95).
So very often we consider sadness and happiness and joy and sorrow as complete opposites, in such a way that one cannot be in the presence of the other. Francis was, of course, filled with sorrow at the Passion of our Lord and filled with joy at having seen the Lord in his glory upon the Cross; it is possible to experience both at the same time and it is good to do so.
It is only right that joy and sorrow, sadness and happiness, mark our lives, for with these seemingly contradictory emotions and characteristics are present within us we imitate the Poverello, and in imitating him we imitate the Lord himself.
My own life is marked with much sadness and yet much happiness, as well. The deaths of my parents, in particular, stand out as the saddest days of my life and have, quite naturally shaped my outlook on the world. And yet, it was through their deaths that I came to experience the joy of suffering with Christ. I am, as it were, a man of joy and sorrow.
It was through their deaths – and through other events of my life as well – the Lord offered his Cross to me. It is not easy to embrace the Cross, but there is also something very intriguing and inviting about it, almost even compelling. The Cross beckons to us and the more we attempt to resist its call, the more intently we hear this call. The more we run from the Cross the greater our sadness becomes, but if we embrace the Cross our sadness is accompanied by much happiness and joy.
It is because my life has been marked with such sadness, I think, that smiling does not come naturally to me. As I walk down the sidewalk or go shopping or what not, I only rarely have a smile on my face; most commonly I am straight-faced, and many – for one reason or another – interpret this as my being sad, when I am in reality quite content. The sorrows of my life daily accompany me; so, too, do the joys of my life. The sadness and joy of the Cross is always present.
For this reason, when I do smile it is a genuine smile and, I am told, it brightens a room. Perhaps it does; if it does, it is because it is authentic and sincere. But let us return now to Saint Francis.
If we look at what is said to be the most authentic and true life image of Saint Francis that we have, his face is one marked by sadness and happiness. Though he bears no smile, a smile is forming, as it were, in his eyes.
Let each of us, then, approach the Cross of Lord in humility of heart, that we, with Saint Francis, might be marked the sorrow and joy of the Cross.
If you don't laugh at this, you must be near death.
Oh, and don't forget to vote in my little poll. One vote per person, please.
Last night most of the boys gathered in the basement of the house where there was a Play Station 3. Hearing the noise from the game and having played video games for most of my life (I got my first job because I played video games) I went downstairs to see what they were playing.
As I rounded a corner I thought I heard the whurr (sp?) of a lightsaber, and I did.
The controller was soon passed to me and I did decently well, considering it was my first time at this game, whose title I don't recall, and that I hadn't played a video game with a controller in quite a long time.
In this game you can use the force to knock enemies away from you, which was most popular with the boys. They kept yelling, "Use the force!" But I preferred to use my lightsaber, which caused more damage and killed the enemies faster; it seemed logical enough to me. But there is a trick, apparently, to using the weapon of the Jedi.
I chased a trooper to the edge of a platform that had no railing and, as I swung my lightsaber to deliver the final blow, both he and I fell to our doom. I guess I forgot to back up a step before making that last stroke.
In any event, my demise was of great amusement to the boys and I suspect I'll hear about it again at some point.
I had a blast down there and I stayed for a bit before returning to the parish for a meeting.
At one point some of the boys asked if I played video games and were surprised to learn that I still have a Play Station (the original) and enjoy games a lot. I don't, however, have it hooked up because video games can be rather addicting.
But after playing yesterday I'm very tempted to hook the old system up again.
On this most solemn of days, dear brothers and sisters, we have come to rejoice in a piece of wood; we exult in that wood on which hung the Savior of the world.
It is right that “we should glory in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, for he is our salvation, our life and our resurrection; through him we are saved and made free.”
For the ancient peoples the cross was the ultimate sign of terror and dread and in this very sign that the world sees as the greatest humiliation and degradation we see the sign of victory that has saved us! We come today to venerate and praise that instrument of our salvation, the cross of Christ.
What is the cross if not the scale that weighed the price of our salvation? The sins of us all were weighed against the life of Christ. Our life came at a very great price, indeed! This cross, the greatest scale of all, fully satisfied the bond of our damnation and released us from our ancient debt incurred through sin.
The cross is, as it were, that great lever that lifted the world and restored it to harmony with the Creator. Under the standard of the cross we find protection from evil, though it does yet realize that Christ has won the victory once for all! While we sat in darkness, the cross transformed us into children of light (cf. Matthew 4:16 and Ephesians 5:8); while we were enemies, it made us members of the household of God; and when we were slaves the cross made us children of God the Father.
It was through wood – through the tree of the knowledge of good and evil – that the prince of pride subjected us to the slavery of sin (cf. Genesis 3:1-24), and it was through wood – the wood of the cross – that the Author of Humility received as his children and as his heirs of grace. Through wood, the Devil subjected us to exile, and through wood the Most High King declared us heirs to his kingdom. Through wood we were reduced to feeding swine and wanting slop, and through wood we were received into our Father’s embrace (cf. Luke 15:12-32).
In short, it was through a piece of wood that we lost friendship with the Lord – the tree of knowledge through which the serpent deceived our first parents, deceiving them into thinking that they, too, in their pride, could be like God.
It was a piece of wood that put us in opposition with our Creator and so it is fitting that another piece of wood should bring us salvation. It was on a piece of wood that Moses lifted up the serpent of bronze when the Lord commanded the people to look upon it and be healed (cf. Numbers 21:4-9). In doing so, Moses gave us a sign to remember when the one true cross would come; it is a sign that the Lord has promised never to abandon us to ourselves.
You must remember, dear brothers and sisters, that on the Day of Judgment each of us must stand before the Lord to give an account of our lives. The holy cross will be carried solemnly in the arms of angels and placed before all of humanity. It will not be adorned with jewels or gold, for what could be more honorable, more precious, than the Blood of the Lamb? God himself will make this cross, this wood, shine more brightly than all of the stars of heaven.
The cross will be the new scales of justice on which we will be weighed and be found either lacking or accepted. The measure against which we will be weighed is none other than the measure of Christ’s own cross: how much have you loved (cf. John 13:34)?
You can be sure of this, that those who lovingly embraced the cross throughout their lives will receive their glory. You can be sure of this, as well, that those who refused to take up the cross will know only disgrace.
The cross is a footpath to those of us just beginning on the journey of faith, a highway for those of us fighting the good fight, and a secure resting place for those who have been good and faithful servants.
For the cross of Christ is the way. “Whoever wishes to come after must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me,” says the Lord. “For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and that of the gospel will save it” (Mark 8:34-35).
To the world the cross looks like hardship and pain, but to those of us who believe, it is a fortress against the night and an oasis against the heat. The cross bears momentary death only to reward us with eternal life. It robs us of earthly things only to compensate us with things from heaven itself. It instructs us in humility in order that we too might be exalted like the Lord our Savior.
All of the world’s wisdom has stood in opposition to the cross, and yet here we are. All of the world’s wisdom sees the cross as a sign of defeat and failure, and yet here are. All of the world’s wisdom tells us that the cross is not the way, that we must be strong and independent, and yet here we are, bending down, as it were, to kiss the holy cross.
Do not think, my brothers and sisters, that the world can be right. If you believe that acceptance of the cross or the practice of humility is a sign of weakness and failure, then you do not know the truth. For only cowards rely on brute strength, and only weaklings prey on the vulnerable. The cross is the very fulcrum which has turned the world upside down – where once there was evil sitting on the throne, now there is love.
That is what we come here to remember. For we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a scandal and to Gentiles foolishness but God’s foolishness is wiser than any human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than any human strength and so, for us who believe, Jews and Gentiles alike, the cross of Christ is nothing less than the power, the wisdom and the glory of God.
O blessed cross, O holy cross, more valuable are you than all the gold of the world, more brilliant are you than any jewels of the earth, for it is through you that we have indeed been saved. May we be found worthy to carry you with our Savior, and be raised with him to heavenly glory. Amen!
 Entrance antiphon of the day.
12 September 2008
that as you are the morning star,
you may by your splendor drive away
the cloud of the devil's suggestions
which cover the earth of our minds.
Do you, who are the full moon,
fill our emptiness and scatter the darkness of our sins,
so that we may be able to come to the fullness of eternal life,
to the light of unending glory.
May he grant this,
who brought you forth to be our light,
who made you to be born,
that he might be born of you.
To him be honor and glory for ever and ever.
11 September 2008
At the beginning of practice yesterday the coach mentioned this and told the boys to keep up their intensity. At the end of practice it was my turn.
I asked the boys, "Do you remember the battle between Moses and King Amalek?" It was answered with quite a few blank stares and no small amount of grumbling.
It was, of course, the battle that "whenever Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed; and whenever he lowered his hand, Amalek prevailed" (Exodus 17:11). I connected it to Moses keeping up his intensity and letting up. I think the message went through.
Now they might hear me yell from the bench, "Keep your arms up!" Given that arms aren't used in soccer this might confuse the other team, but hopefully our boys will remember what it means.
Within the hour we play the Effingham High School Hearts. If we keep the intensity, we should win, given that the game isn't on account of the weather.
10 September 2008
It prompted a bit of a debate as to which video game is the best, The Legend of Zelda or Super Mario bros.
Would you be so kind as to offer your vote in the poll on the right. I'll keep the poll up through Sunday and give the results to the boys on Monday before our game. Thanks!
I agree, so I am happy to give you, in full and unedited, the two recent statements of the Bishops.
The first statement, issued in reponse to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi:
In the course of a “Meet the Press” interview on abortion and other public issues on August 24, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi misrepresented the history and nature of the authentic teaching of the Catholic Church against abortion.
In fact, the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches, "Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law." (No. 2271)
In the Middle Ages, uninformed and inadequate theories about embryology led some theologians to speculate that specifically human life capable of receiving an immortal soul may not exist until a few weeks into pregnancy. While in canon law these theories led to a distinction in penalties between very early and later abortions, the Church’s moral teaching never justified or permitted abortion at any stage of development.
These mistaken biological theories became obsolete over 150 years ago when scientists discovered that a new human individual comes into being from the union of sperm and egg at fertilization. In keeping with this modern understanding, the Church teaches that from the time of conception (fertilization), each member of the human species must be given the full respect due to a human person, beginning with respect for the fundamental right to life.
More information on the Church's teaching on this issue can be found in our brochure "The Catholic Church is a Pro-Life Church".
Recently we had a duty to clarify the Catholic Church’s constant teaching against abortion, to correct misrepresentations of that teaching by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on “Meet the Press” (see www.usccb.org/prolife/whatsnew.shtml). On September 7, again on “Meet the Press,” Senator Joseph Biden made some statements about that teaching that also deserve a response.
Senator Biden did not claim that Catholic teaching allows or has ever allowed abortion. He said rightly that human life begins “at the moment of conception,” and that Catholics and others who recognize this should not be required by others to pay for abortions with their taxes.
However, the Senator’s claim that the beginning of human life is a “personal and private” matter of religious faith, one which cannot be “imposed” on others, does not reflect the truth of the matter. The Church recognizes that the obligation to protect unborn human life rests on the answer to two questions, neither of which is private or specifically religious.
The first is a biological question: When does a new human life begin? When is there a new living organism of the human species, distinct from mother and father and ready to develop and mature if given a nurturing environment? While ancient thinkers had little verifiable knowledge to help them answer this question, today embryology textbooks confirm that a new human life begins at conception (see www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/bioethic/fact298.shtml). The Catholic Church does not teach this as a matter of faith; it acknowledges it as a matter of objective fact.
The second is a moral question, with legal and political consequences: Which living members of the human species should be seen as having fundamental human rights, such as a right not to be killed? The Catholic Church’s answer is: Everybody. No human being should be treated as lacking human rights, and we have no business dividing humanity into those who are valuable enough to warrant protection and those who are not. This is not solely a Catholic teaching, but a principle of natural law accessible to all people of good will. The framers of the Declaration of Independence pointed to the same basic truth by speaking of inalienable rights, bestowed on all members of the human race not by any human power, but by their Creator. Those who hold a narrower and more exclusionary view have the burden of explaining why we should divide humanity into those who have moral value and those who do not and why their particular choice of where to draw that line can be sustained in a pluralistic society. Such views pose a serious threat to the dignity and rights of other poor and vulnerable members of the human family who need and deserve our respect and protection.
While in past centuries biological knowledge was often inaccurate, modern science leaves no excuse for anyone to deny the humanity of the unborn child. Protection of innocent human life is not an imposition of personal religious conviction but a demand of justice.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: “Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law” (No. 2271).
In response to those who say this teaching has changed or is of recent origin, here are the facts:
From earliest times, Christians sharply distinguished themselves from surrounding pagan cultures by rejecting abortion and infanticide. The earliest widely used documents of Christian teaching and practice after the New Testament in the 1st and 2nd centuries, the Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) and Letter of Barnabas, condemned both practices, as did early regional and particular Church councils.
To be sure, knowledge of human embryology was very limited until recent times. Many Christian thinkers accepted the biological theories of their time, based on the writings of Aristotle (4th century BC) and other philosophers. Aristotle assumed a process was needed over time to turn the matter from a woman’s womb into a being that could receive a specifically human form or soul. The active formative power for this process was thought to come entirely from the man – the existence of the human ovum (egg), like so much of basic biology, was unknown.
However, such mistaken biological theories never changed the Church’s common conviction that abortion is gravely wrong at every stage. At the very least, early abortion was seen as attacking a being with a human destiny, being prepared by God to receive an immortal soul (cf. Jeremiah 1:5: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you”).
In the 5th century AD this rejection of abortion at every stage was affirmed by the great bishop-theologian St. Augustine. He knew of theories about the human soul not being present until some weeks into pregnancy. Because he used the Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament, he also thought the ancient Israelites had imposed a more severe penalty for accidentally causing a miscarriage if the fetus was “fully formed” (Exodus 21: 22-23), language not found in any known Hebrew version of this passage. But he also held that human knowledge of biology was very limited, and he wisely warned against misusing such theories to risk committing homicide. He added that God has the power to make up all human deficiencies or lack of development in the Resurrection, so we cannot assume that the earliest aborted children will be excluded from enjoying eternal life with God.
In the 13th century, St. Thomas Aquinas made extensive use of Aristotle’s thought, including his theory that the rational human soul is not present in the first few weeks of pregnancy. But he also rejected abortion as gravely wrong at every stage, observing that it is a sin “against nature” to reject God’s gift of a new life.
During these centuries, theories derived from Aristotle and others influenced the grading of penalties for abortion in Church law. Some canonical penalties were more severe for a direct abortion after the stage when the human soul was thought to be present. However, abortion at all stages continued to be seen as a grave moral evil.
From the 13th to 19th centuries, some theologians speculated about rare and difficult cases where they thought an abortion before “formation” or “ensoulment” might be morally justified. But these theories were discussed and then always rejected, as the Church refined and reaffirmed its understanding of abortion as an intrinsically evil act that can never be morally right.
In 1827, with the discovery of the human ovum, the mistaken biology of Aristotle was discredited. Scientists increasingly understood that the union of sperm and egg at conception produces a new living being that is distinct from both mother and father. Modern genetics demonstrated that this individual is, at the outset, distinctively human, with the inherent and active potential to mature into a human fetus, infant, child and adult. From 1869 onward the obsolete distinction between the “ensouled” and “unensouled” fetus was permanently removed from canon law on abortion.
Secular laws against abortion were being reformed at the same time and in the same way, based on secular medical experts’ realization that “no other doctrine appears to be consonant with reason or physiology but that which admits the embryo to possess vitality from the very moment of conception” (American Medical Association, Report on Criminal Abortion, 1871).
Thus modern science has not changed the Church’s constant teaching against abortion, but has underscored how important and reasonable it is, by confirming that the life of each individual of the human species begins with the earliest embryo.
Given the scientific fact that a human life begins at conception, the only moral norm needed to understand the Church’s opposition to abortion is the principle that each and every human life has inherent dignity, and thus must be treated with the respect due to a human person. This is the foundation for the Church’s social doctrine, including its teachings on war, the use of capital punishment, euthanasia, health care, poverty and immigration. Conversely, to claim that some live human beings do not deserve respect or should not be treated as “persons” (based on changeable factors such as age, condition, location, or lack of mental or physical abilities) is to deny the very idea of inherent human rights. Such a claim undermines respect for the lives of many vulnerable people before and after birth.
I've said to a number of friends that Obama's rise to influence too closely resembles the rise of several historical personages, the rise of whom has not been a boon to the majority of their people. Though I was previously unaware of his idea for civilian national secuirty force, this only confirms my suspicions.
Craig, one of our senior players, who also blogs over at Argyle socs n' mocs, wrote an article for the Effingham Daily News:
The County fairgrounds saw one more dog fight this Tuesday evening, as the St. Anthony Bulldogs and Carlyle Indians varsity soccer teams viciously battled to a tie. With seventeen and nine shots on goal respectively, the two teams played a fairly balanced game. Each team did seem to dominate their fair share, though.
The Bulldogs succeeded on three of those seventeen shots, two of which were scored in the second half. The first half was held by the Bulldogs as they took the lead in about the middle of the half, as Riley Westendorf managed to put the ball in the back of the net unassisted. Carlyle failed to score in the first half.
The second half succeeded in mixing up the action. Five of the six goals were scored, and the Indians showed some reignited flames. Michael Kabbes blasted a ball into the goal off of a pass from Evan Hakman. Brett Haarmann followed that success with his own goal prompted by a corner kick taken by Charles McGuire. After these two goals, the Bulldogs took the largest lead they’ve had for the season.
St. Anthony’s varsity goalkeeper, Cody Sandschaefer, allowed three goals from the opposing team, all of which were in the second half. The third and final goal, which brought the tally to a tie, was scored off of a penalty kick called on Craig Brummer in the far corner of the box. The call raised some eyebrows, and some voices, but the team played on.
Emotions ran high as the game came to an end, and the final whistle caused some despair. Coach Shane Nelson commented on the outcome of the game. “We played well as a team. It’s nice to see a young team put forth such effort game after game. We had more shots on goals than any other game, and more goals than the rest of our season combined.” Ten of Carlyle’s fourteen team members were first-year players.